Thursday, April 02, 2009
This weekend: Aylesbury away, and the parallel universe of the National Cup
A reminder that on Sunday we are away to Aylesbury, both U18s and U15s. Meeting at the club at 11.00. This will actually be our first visit to Aylesbury - address:
Aylesbury Rugby Football Club
Ostler's Field
Brook End
Weston Turville
Aylesbury
Bucks
HP22 5RN
That aside we didn't enter again this year, partly due to concerns that our playing strength was not big enough on our own (were not part if a registered cluster "on registration" - ie. at the start of the season - so also could not combine with anyone else), and partly because in previous years the tournament has often included teams of - how can I put it? - an "unusual strength" for an allegedly club rugby event. Obviously there is no evidence that this will be happening this year...
Indeed this year's Cup hides evidence of some good news of massively successful (but unreported) recruitment drives. Several of the clubs who have entered this season are only Category B members of RFUW, which means that at the start of the season they had fewer than 15 playing members. Yet now, without combining with any other clubs (or, presumably, poaching their players), they are able to enter a competition that - in effect- requires squads of experienced players numbering in the twenties. Well done to them!
Meanwhile, partly as a result of the failure to fill all the places on offer, the format of this year's event is, well, "original" might be a good word. Details from the north are, as usual, a shade sketchy but I hear that in the south the South East and South West qualification rounds have been combined.
Six teams (Reading, Thornbury, Exeter Sarries, Oakmedians, Welwyn and Wimborne) have all been placed in a single group, and each team will play all of the others over two weekends in Reading (5th and 26th April) with the winner goes to the final. The games are 15 mins each way, with two games on one day and three games on the next. Which I guess sounds great on paper - except for the fact that it breaks rather spectacularly a basic guideline for any sporting competition - the one that says "Avoid Dead Rubbers".
A "Dead Rubber" is a match in a tournament where one, or both, teams taking part have already been knocked out. Its a safe bet that, as a result, the teams concerned will rarely play at their full abilities - indeed it is not unusual for teams drawn to play in "Dead Rubbers" to withdraw from such matches altogether, going home rather than "risk players in games that don't matter".
The above format does not so much break that rule as batter it to death with a sledgehammer before jumping up and down on the pieces. Consider... to win the group you really cannot afford to lose more than one game - at most. It is not impossible, but it is statistically very unlikely that a team with two defeats will stand any chance of going through.
But it is inevitable - assuming there are no tied games - that at least one team (and probably two) will lose both of the opening two games. Given that... why the heck would they bother returning for next round of games three weeks later? Why trek from, say, Exeter to Reading (and good 300-400 miles round trip) to play a series of (for you) meaningless fixtures? In fact, by the time you complete the third round of games at least half of the teams in the group will inevitably be "knocked out". When you work it out, at least a third of all the games will be "dead rubbers".
Why should this matter? Well, even if the teams do show up, if you are playing a crucial game against another team who are still "in" the competition, how fair do you think it will be if a rival on the next pitch is up against opponents who are, mentally at least, already on the bus home?
And why go to all this needless expense (ie. preparing and hiring grounds, and busing 100+ girls from across south of England twice) when the competition could be wrapped up with two pools of three and a final (plus classification games) on a single weekend? Madness. But fortunately madness we do not need to worry about!
Labels:
Fixture news,
National Cup
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Most popular posts in last 30 days
- World Cup Sevens preview: Pool A
- New arrangements for post-match food at home
- So... Where now with the Letchworth Girls' blog?
- RFU forums are back
- France win U20 series 3-0
- RFUW proposes a whole new world for 2010/11
- The weekend's county festivals cancelled
- Letchworth blog wins major RFU award
- A team to beat the Black Ferns?
- New season, new structure, new controversy
Most Popular Posts of all time
- World Cup Sevens preview: Pool A
- New arrangements for post-match food at home
- The best rugby photos of the year
- Herts Sevens 2012: Enter now!
- So... Where now with the Letchworth Girls' blog?
- RFU forums are back
- Familiar face in short-list for IRB "Rugby Photo of the Year"
- Matt Damon to star in new rugby movie
- Wanted: Revolving Door Engineer...
- Women's rugby.... in 1928!
Thanks for the information about the south u/18s competition.The north u/18s has been put back to the 26th as only 4 teams have entered.Do you know how many have entered the u/15s event.
ReplyDeleteExeter B catergory or could be SWS.
ReplyDeleteWimborne B catergory but remember they have since the beginning of the year clustered with Ellingham B catergory
All others A catergory
Oakmedians didn't bother turning up at all even to the first round in the south and wimborne aren't turning to the second round as they can't possibly win and have two critical league matches left to play......touche!
ReplyDelete