National/Regional 10s: what did you think of it?

RFUW want your feedback on the 10s - especially as it was the first year it has been run.

They have circulated a "standard" reply form asking for marks out of five for things like "Suitability of Venue", "Number of pitches", "Organisation of the Event", "Organisation of the day", "Playing Format", and "Opportunity to purchase Beverages" (why "beverages" should have a capital 'B' I'm not sure...) but the key bit of the form is the final box entitled "Further comments".

This box probably matters more than all the above put together so please could I have an idea of what you thought of it all - not just yesterday (aspects of which did not exactly please many of you I gather) but both tournaments, and also the overall "concept".

In short - do you want RFUW to do it again? And if so is there anything they could do to improve things (I could think of half-a-dozen but I will refrain from saying what they might be for now)?

Email me your responses (however short!), or bung them on here as comments, or let me know on Wednesday. I am aiming to do a co-ordinated response to RFUW by next weekend so don't delay.

By the way apparently we finished fifth, two points ahead of Dorking, with Worcester the overall (unbeaten) champions. Full scores now appear on the Herts blog.